England’s Demise is Britain’s Dawn
05.07.2009
Posted in: Declarations Comments (0)
21.08.2006
Militant lesbians, feminists and other careerist gun molls of the FRG’s ideological system have recently won one of the last battles in a war they are going to lose: a news presenter of the broadcasting cooperation NDR who in books had expressed old truths about the role of woman, was pushed into quitting her employment – i.e. something correct – in order to defend the incorrect, the wage labour of mothers and wives. The struggle of the sexes and the struggle of the races are auxiliary fronts of class struggle. The ideological political apparatus of the Capitalist class drives women into the labour market in order to break the market power of the proletarian men. The importation of foreign and racially alien labour forces serves the same purpose. In order to understand that feminisation, foreignisation and enforced racial mixing are but weapons of the Capitalist class in its struggle against the proletarian class, one only needs to apply the law of supply and demand to the labour force market: the family wage of the proletarian family provider, and thus ethical life can no longer be sustained due to the oversupply of unmarried female and foreign labour on the domestic labour market. Extra-domestic female wage labour is at first a temporary expedient of the family and later becomes the bad habit of self-debasement. The men’s honour, which forbids them from sending their wives to foreign people to work becomes irrelevant and disappears. The matrimonial and family status is itself ousted by the unmarried status; the end is given with the status of wretchedness of the single mothers and now with the demographic catastrophe – the absolute pauperisation of the German People under Capitalist foreign rule. The childless woman currently chancellorising the FRG personifies in a special way the imminent death of the German People and the failed existence of woman in general, combined with a typical state-parasitical double wage of the regime’s functionary couples, which puffs itself up as emancipation. Feminism committed the first and fundamental betrayal of Dutschkism (i.e. the national revolutionary seizure of the word in 1968). Feminism was the mother of all West German counter-revolutions. For a national-revolutionary it is not classes, or races, or women who make revolutions, but the Peoples. “Revolutions are not made by a party, but by the whole People,” wrote Karl Marx (MEW 34, 514). After feminism had stabbed the ideals of the 1968 generation in the back and had severed the masculine virile aspect of the People as the historical and revolutionary subject, the social-democratic, Communist traditionalists again dared to rear their heads in the guise of the professional revolutionaries, or cadres, of the 1970s. The working class was again declared the revolutionary subject, even though it continued to dwindle. In the 1980s the Conservatives and Liberals took the initiative of the counter-revolutionary class struggle and surmounted themselves in the economic bubbles of the 1990s where capital began to comprehend itself as a permanent revolution and the business economist played the revolutionary in the role of the global omni-destroyer. The emancipatory, anti-racist and anti-national politics of capital now not only destroyed the natural ethical life of the families and the corporate ethical life of the civil societies, but also the actual ethical life of the states and nations. But the Dutschkistic strategy has been proven right. In late Capitalism the unemployment of the masses has become the principal social characteristic, for in addition to the state class, over 40 percent of the population in the FRG are currently living off the transfer system and thus belong to the anarchist class. Today, civil society is no longer mainly possession-civil (factors property and capital) and no longer qualification-civil (factor labour) but post-proletarian uncommanded, i.e. anarchic. The common feature of the post 1968 counter-revolutions was the division of the People – as subject of the revolution – into gender or classes. All strategies of the counter-revolution therefore always amount to a civil war, at least in the spheres of ideology and politics. West German feminism was the pacesetter which paved the way for the infiltration of Capitalism into the families in a particularly insidious fashion with its demand for paid housework, and thus hindered the procreation and natural rearing of uncountable numbers of children. It is not without reason that the epitome of man in its historically highest perfection is the human male. High cultures come into being only through the dominance of the man over woman and child, over kith and kin, clan and People. Cultural decay always goes hand in hand with an advance of matriarchy and a recession of patriarchy. In the animal kingdom matriarchies occur predominantly in the lower classes and become increasingly seldom with evolutionary progression. The relationship of gender and family does not belong to the indirect sphere of the state and civil society, but is direct, natural ethical life – the kingdom of paternal rule which is the foundation of all human circumstances derived from it. Here, the women have nevertheless more to say than the men, whose achievements for the fatherland are still appraised in the mother-tongue.
Posted in: Declarations Comment (1)
27.04.2006
“It follows that man has his actual substantive life in the state, in learning, and so forth, as well as in labour and struggle with the external world and with himself so that it is only out of his diremption that he fights his way to self-subsistent unity with himself. In the family he has a tranquil intuition of this unity, and there he lives a subjective ethical life on the plane of feeling. Woman, on the other hand, has her substantive destiny in the family, and to be imbued with family piety is her ethical frame of mind.” (Hegel, Philosophy of Right, § 166) While the administration of the FRG debates about further far-reaching intrusions into the community by means of detaining children in institutions of keeping and paid depaterisation, the news presenter Eva Herman debunks modern emancipation as a “fatal error” and a work of destruction. The meaning of the word emancipation has, in fact, become inverted. What was once the release of a slave or son into independence and autonomy is now self-liberation: the former act of clemency has thus become a breach of right. For each release from responsibility and duty infringes on the rights of another – that of the emancipated woman infringes on the right of the family. However, treason against one’s own substantial destiny can only be had for the price of the previously determined self-destruction. The abolition of the family as it is demanded in the “Communist Manifesto”, which was once the anti-Communist odious image par excellence, executes itself within developed Capitalism. The emancipation of women is the guidon of the corruption of community into society. Its highest demand is the recognition of domestic work as wage labour, by which means the man is cast as an exploiter. Emancipation perishes in absolute pauperisation where the unruly children first become useless labour force and bad parents and where the unborn children of the latter finally cause the labour force to disappear completely. The natural solution of the family, however, releases the children once they are mature as free persons into civil society, in which they then remain as children of the state. The positive, endless process of life in the realm of the objective spirit is fulfilled with the transition of the natural substantial ethical life of the families into the reflected ethical life of civil society and finally into the state as reality of the ethical idea. The rational and thus the own destiny is met. The certainty, however, of having done that which is rational, is blessedness. The growth of domestic automation only seemingly aids and abets the breakdown of the families, for, the domestic labour force that had now become available was now ready to be hired at the market and distributed, as idealised by democracy. However, used as an end in itself for the family, domestic technology promises to encourage and facilitate the bearing and raising of children that is necessary for our own sake. Not the establishment of further institutions for the keeping of children and the nursing of the elderly ought to be the order of the day, but the very opposite: returning the children and elderly back home. Not support for the wage labour of women solves an unemployment problem of the malnourished country, but the very opposite: back to tending the hearth. Not perverted emancipation is the greatest of life’s adventures, but the very opposite: remancipation – the act of delivering and surrendering oneself to another, in whom I recognise my actual, ethical self as another. Gernot Kröslin
Posted in: Declarations Comments (0)
in: Concentration Camp FRG